The law of criminal procedure revised by the fourth session of the no . eight national congress of people came into force in january 1997 1997年1月,經(jīng)全國(guó)人大八屆四次會(huì)議修正的刑事訴訟法正式生效。
Owing to many malpractice exposed in the construction of second instance procedure system of current law of criminal procedure in our country , the system find itself unable to give an exact embodyment of its characteristics and regularity in motion of the procedure , find it hard to give a normal play to the efficiency of the second instance procedure , causing many problems in practical dispensing justice 刑事第二審程序是整個(gè)刑事程序制度的一個(gè)重要環(huán)節(jié),其制度功能主要表現(xiàn)為制度的救濟(jì)性。由于我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟法關(guān)于第二審程序的制度建構(gòu)暴露出許多弊端,不能準(zhǔn)確體現(xiàn)第二審程序制度的特點(diǎn)和程序的運(yùn)行規(guī)律,難以正常發(fā)揮第二審程序的功效,從而給實(shí)際執(zhí)行帶來(lái)許多問(wèn)題。
China revised the law of criminal procedure in 1996 , which processed a little big reformation to the original criminal procedure system by absorbing and borrowing some effective procedures of the law system of the great britain and the usa . on the aspect of criminal justice , the justice method is from the original way of interrogation that is dominated by judge , to the present counterplot system that is dominated by both accusing party and accused party on lawcourt . this kind of inquire method on the lawcourt shall be more beneficial to protect the right of accused party and has the promoting function to realize the fair of justice 我國(guó)1996年修訂的《刑事訴訟法》 ,對(duì)原來(lái)的刑事訴訟制度進(jìn)行了較大的改革,在某些方面借鑒和吸收了英美法系國(guó)家有益的做法,表現(xiàn)在刑事審判方式上,就是從以前由法官主導(dǎo)的審問(wèn)制向由控辯雙方主導(dǎo)的對(duì)抗制進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)變,對(duì)抗制的庭審方式應(yīng)該更加有利于保障被告人的訴訟權(quán)利,對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正起到促進(jìn)作用。
The transition from " trespass theory " to " privacy guard theory " , the expectation of privacy , and the concern of victims and criminals are all evidences proving that privacy right has been considerably stressed in the law of criminal procedure 隱私權(quán)在刑事訴訟領(lǐng)域的訴求體現(xiàn)在:是否屬于強(qiáng)制措施的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)從“物理人侵說(shuō)”轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)椤半[私權(quán)保護(hù)說(shuō), ;偵查措施中的“合理的隱私期待” ;為保護(hù)隱私權(quán)在偵查程序中采取相應(yīng)的技術(shù)性規(guī)范;被害人的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)以及刑罰執(zhí)行過(guò)程中的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)等。